Posted on 04/27/2013 6:32:33 PM PDT by lowbridge
The YouTube channel Patriot News Organization on Thursday uploaded a training video from the Department of Homeland Security that depicts a fake news broadcast about a police SWAT team raiding an American house and arresting "extremist" members of a local militia group for possession of illegal firearms and planning to commit terrorist attacks.
Very disturbing video straight from DHS website - they use it to help train all of the deputized agencies during a crisis, even hospital administrators, media faces, everything and everyone that would be involved in such an event, reads the Patriot News Organizations description of the video.
Exactly when the video was made is unclear, but the video description links to a DHS website featuring documents that were uploaded in 2009 and 2012.
In the video, a fake local news anchor comes on the screen with breaking news.
Reports of possible illegal activity by a local militia group appears to have spurred law enforcement into action, the anchor says.
The video then cuts to John Gleason at the site in front of a house with fake fire fighters and SWAT officers swarming the area.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
Ping, sounded familiar.
The US ammo makers have chosen tier side.
Their last little excursion with right wing militia members resulted in a round of acquittals, getting smacked by a federal judge, and now the lawsuits are starting.
The US ammo makers have chosen their side.
This is why these idiots are missing the muzzies actually doing the attacks. Now as to why they are letting muzzies off the hook is something that needs to be investigated by ........................?
Of course they can’t use the most likely scenario of mooselimb terrorists bombing a soft target in a US city. Oh no, that would be politically incorrect.
What is Mossad?
Muzzies? What Muzzies?
Obama investigates Boston Marathon Bombing
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=cd9_1367068174
The outcome is already known.
The DHS has outlived its usefullness.
Maybe Mr. President is morphing the DHS into the “civilian defense” army that he promised us a few years ago.
It’s like Germany in the 30’s.
Just waiting for the enabling act....
All: don’t be shocked or react emotionally. Ridicule them for their own paranoia and hysteria. Foreign enemies do “terrorist” attacks, while large numbers of official socialists panic over the writings of a few who indulge too much in conspiracy tales (mostly harmless).
We all remember the words from the Obama Syndicate that, "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before." (Rahm Emanuel)
Now put this in the perspective of terrorism in the homeland. What would Zer0 want to accomplish if such terrorism were allowed to happen? Do you remember SWAT members going door to door looking for that bomber in Boston? People were searched and pulled out of their homes unconstitutionally. It was a police state. I leave you up to your imagination. However, I will give a general idea of what will happen using some math:
Totalitarianism^inf
In Max Velocity’s book, “Contact! A Tactical manual for Post Collapse ...” he draws a clear distinction between SWAT entry/breaching techniques and military MOUT/OBUA operations.
SWAT techniques work when the suspect(s) is in A structure that can be contained and swarmed/flooded — thus the ‘stacking’ you see them do outside a door prior to a breach.
The point is that a true insurgent with military intent and training would not ‘hole up’ in a non-defensible position, on his own, in a fragile suburban or rural home.
If these folks ever do have to face a military-style ‘enemy’, their SWAT tactics will get them killed. THAT is Max’s point.
It would seem so.
p.s. I would bet that ‘Travis’ is out on his boat this weekend and won’t see your ping for a while.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.