I'm shocked, shocked I tell you!
Mother be wrong. . . . . .
What else can one expect from a Marxist/Leninist publication?
It is maybe as hilarious as the old Radio Albania.
see my tagline
There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.
Scroll towards the bottom - daily roll up of worldwide Islamic violent events/attacks: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/index.html#Attacks
I really would like to know why Brietbart or one of the other Conservative outlets does not do an in-depth investigative multi-part/in depth piece on how often the media has lied over the years, in what direction, with full examples and with names named.
Then push it hard and do not back off. And I mean do NOT back off. Not the occasional story that we all see and the genpub ignores. Make it so thorough and naming so many leftists in the media that it can’t be.
And I mean examples of left BS that has hurt the victim groups. The stories ignored/dropped/buried (Africa/Aids, Homelessness under a Dem president/ Black unemployment and promises etc.
Sure the MSM will their spin. But since people are questioning them and the Dems more by the day, the ‘C’SM might wanna strike while the iron is hot and drive the narrative for a change.
Might even get results.
LEFT-WING EXTREMISM: The Current Threat
From a 2001 report: https://www.fas.org/irp/world/para/left.pdf
None of these killers were members of the National Rifle Association. None of them claimed to be born-again Christians.
If one’s reads the article, it’s clear that most of what MJ reports as “right wing” is not “right wing” in any meaningful sense, and many of the incidents have no political motivation at all (for example, one clown who killed somebody because a dog peed on his lawn).
But the purpose of the MJ article is not to report facts, it’s to give cover - within week, bozo’s like Juan Williams and Bill Maher will be arguing that there’s published data that right-wing terrorists have killed more people than Islamists, and if they’re debating anyone with any sense, those folks will not have wasted their lives reading crap in Mother Jones, and are unlikely to have assimilated all of the info in the Breitbart piece.
Bookmark.
Well that link totally locked up my PC.
LLS
The article may be right. The confusion is in the accepted definition of the political spectrum, left and right. These people, MJ included, are fascists disguised as liberals. They want government rule (totalitarianism), they want indoctrination, they live in a world of extreme propaganda. They are fascists, they are “right-wing” by their own definition of the political spectrum. They just want you to believe that are not, and that right-wing and Islamic terror are separated, when they are the same thing.
Lemmie see now.................
One one side, 45-50 MILLION dead babies. (Add approx 3500 daily to that appalling number.)
On the other...................................crickets.
Just another Mother load.
“Mother Jones?” Please....
If MJ magazine DIDN’T make comments like that, I’d be getting worried.
They were talking out their mid sections again.
This is a publication with readers who will accept anything they say because they say it. They would have loved Stalin, expecially on the day he inisisted that the invaders from the west were British, not German.
“Keith Luke (2): A white supremacist broke into an apartment, raped a woman, and shot two more people in 2009. He planned to attack a Jewish synagogue. His motive: killing “nonwhite people.” That is not right-wing. That is white supremacist. But the left always lumps in neo-Nazi types with the right, despite the fact that the Nazi movement was left-wing in orientation.”
A fact that libtards simply can not or will not accept.
MJ is just another comedian dressed in a grandma suit tryin to get laughs... don’t they know that’s boring already?