You are saying that infinity is conditioned upon the needs of humans. That is not what infinity is. But call it what you want. We are just arguing over words, not the amount of hydrocarbons available to humans, which we seem to agree about. Your need to support the theory of abiotic hydrocarbons by calling its supply "infinite" is simply exaggeration through misuse of the word infinite. It doesn't help your cause to be so irrational about it.
10 to the one millionth power is still not infinite. The universe itself is finite, at least as far as human perceptions are concerned. If that is true, then by definition, the supply of oil is also finite. But so far, it seems to be more than enough, and may well be regenerating within the earth. Us humans are studying that.
>> You are saying that infinity is conditioned upon the needs of humans.
You’re going to have to work harder at putting words in my mouth.
>> 10 to the one millionth power is still not infinite.
Is it really necessary to stipulate that especially when I showed an infinite quotient?
>> The universe itself is finite,
Really? And you can prove that along what dimension?