No, that is what the Fourteenth says.
This opinion is explicitly rejected.
By a crooked progressivist court. Read the minority opinion cited in the article you didn't read.
And it explicitly rejects this one.
No, it doesn't. The court did.
Yes, it does. I know you have trouble following the plain and clear words of the constitution.
You can't read because you don't know the difference in the law at that time between "subject to the jurisdiction" and being within a jurisdiction.
You gave it a good shot, Carry_okie!
“By a crooked progressivist court.”
Ah. I see. So we’ve moved on from, “the Constitution doesn’t say this, to, “the courts got it wrong”. If you want to change the constitution to read what you want it to say, there’s always the Amending formula. Good luck with that, btw.