[gleeaikin]

Is this a true statement?

Zahedi asserts that the sessions were rather about saying no to unwanted advances as opposed to encouraging homosexual acts.

“In planning the discussion, we made it clear that absolutely no discussion of any sexual acts is appropriate to middle school, and they used the examples of a kiss,” she wrote in an online forum for parents. “It was a separate activity for boys and girls and ultimately about respect and safety.”

[donna]

Yeah, because when you hand your children over to strange teachers to be raised, the first thing that should happen is that your kids are asked to pretend-sin...to learn a lesson.

[Wanderer99]

“respect and safety” for the state cause. The sex partner is a flesh toy.

[FamiliarFace]

Zahedi asserts that the sessions were rather about saying no to unwanted advances as opposed to encouraging homosexual acts.

Is this a true statement?

It can't possibly be a true statement if the boys "were counseled to keep a condom in their pocket at all times." It would be an example of saying yes to a sexual act, rather than no to one, wanted or unwanted, homosexual or otherwise. The principal is being disingenuous, as is the required program.

[Apple Blossom]

Zahedi asserts that the sessions were rather about saying no to unwanted advances as opposed to encouraging homosexual acts.

While we want to make sure kids know how to say "no" to unwanted advances, we certainly don't want to give the kids' parents the opportunity to say "no" to unwanted classes./s