Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Now about those budget cuts, Mr. President...
1 posted on 04/23/2013 6:14:32 AM PDT by raptor22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: raptor22

Sink an aircraft carrier. It becomes a hot war. Obama has no say. Field commanders annihilate China. Are they that stupid?

I know the Keyan idiot is, but is China? Then again they are commies which means they’re stupid.


2 posted on 04/23/2013 6:21:44 AM PDT by mindburglar (It must be noon, because I'm drunk somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

Well, why not? American has elected a weak, apologetic appeaser twice now. Why shouldn’t our enemies get in our face and start pushing the boundaries? Obama and his administration are far more concerned with social engineering in the Armed Forces than national defense anyway. And I think he actually prefers a weakened America, because after all, it’s not fair to the rest of the world that we’re so powerful and prosperous.


3 posted on 04/23/2013 6:23:41 AM PDT by barefoot_hiker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum; markomalley; Clairity; Carlucci; grey_whiskers; meyer; WL-law; Para-Ord.45; ...

IBD EDITORIAL PING


5 posted on 04/23/2013 6:25:32 AM PDT by raptor22 (Visit my blog at True Conservatives on Twitter: http://t.co/IKpP3cwq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

.......I’m no Admiral but I don’t think I would take a 5-10 billion dollar asset with 5,000 personnel on board within range of this missile while hoping and praying that our anti-missile missile would protect me. And, this is to say nothing of all the ships that accompany a carrier.

And, if BB ordered me to, I think I would resign right then and there.

This does beg the question of whether or not these hugely expensive carriers are still viable in 21st Century warfare.


8 posted on 04/23/2013 6:33:56 AM PDT by Cen-Tejas (it's the debt bomb stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

More worried about shore to ship batteries the Chinese developed, sold to Iran and now threaten our big blue water ships operating in the narrow Persian Gulf.


9 posted on 04/23/2013 6:42:21 AM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave; granite; GreenFreeper; grjr21; I got the rope; IchBinEinBerliner; jaredt112; JayB; ...

IBD EDITORIAL PING


10 posted on 04/23/2013 6:43:17 AM PDT by raptor22 (Visit my blog at True Conservatives on Twitter: http://t.co/IKpP3cwq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

I don’t know what the Office of Naval Research (ONR) is doing right now, but if they can just come up with a slap-dash design for a *simple* ship, that only needs to do *one* thing well, they need to do so right now.

That ship needs to have a nuclear reactor, which requires significant design elements, and two independent energy “guns” that can take down missiles. It doesn’t have to do *anything* else. No bells and whistles. No missiles or other weapons of its own.

And it never strays from the aircraft carrier task group.


12 posted on 04/23/2013 6:55:53 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking; StopGlobalWhining; Straight Vermonter; Tampa Caver; TChris; ...

IBD EDITORIAL PING


13 posted on 04/23/2013 7:07:01 AM PDT by raptor22 (Visit my blog at True Conservatives on Twitter: http://t.co/IKpP3cwq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

China’s been our designated manufacturing producer for decades, while American working class men (the real American men) have been falsely accused and robbed. There are consequences for the wrongs committed by the socially pathological political/regulator class: default, weaknesses against foreign enemies and others.

During the next few years, remember how you treated fathers and men.


17 posted on 04/23/2013 11:51:32 AM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

Hopefully a SM-3 + AEGIS can take it out.

The Chinese cannot be sure it cannot. Deterrence.


21 posted on 04/23/2013 4:38:26 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

China to build second, larger carrier - report
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/24/china-navy-carrier-idUSL3N0DA9BT20130424?feedType=RSS&feedName=industrialsSector&rpc=43


24 posted on 04/23/2013 10:24:54 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (IÂ’m not a Republican, IÂ’m a conservative! Pubbies haven't been conservative since before T.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson