Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The details are worth reading. Excellent 10th Amendment logic.
1 posted on 04/22/2013 9:17:19 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

Excellent.


2 posted on 04/22/2013 9:21:30 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Leftist, Progressive, Socialist, Communist, fundamentalist Islamic policies, the death of a nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

GOD BLESS THE GOOD PEOPLE OF MISSOURI.

I hope and pray other states follow. I’m not naive enough to extend that hope to the benighted state I am currently forced to dwell in.


3 posted on 04/22/2013 9:24:34 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
By a vote of 115-41, state lawmakers approved the Second Amendment Preservation Act (HB 436), with nine Democrats crossing the aisle and voting “aye.”

9 Dems in Missouri are smarter then the Dems (and the RINOS) in Washington, DC?

5 posted on 04/22/2013 9:50:27 AM PDT by ExCTCitizen (Deport all Muslims...yes, All Muslims!! No more Muslim Terrorists...Deport them all...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Just another Joe

For your info..........


7 posted on 04/22/2013 9:57:52 AM PDT by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Anyone here see the irony? This is the state that gave the feds their list of concealed gun permit holders.

The feds have been trying to coerce KY into giving its CCDW list to them. As far as I know, hasn’t happened...yet. We have a pretty leftist governor, I don’t trust him AT ALL.

CCDW holders are first on the list when they come after gun owners. The feds are trying hard to get those names from the states. Only a fool would think they won’t be successful in at least some. May as well decide now how you are going to respond when they do.


8 posted on 04/22/2013 10:03:14 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

bkmk


9 posted on 04/22/2013 11:31:49 AM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
It might also be good to note that while it's true that any legitimate decision by the Supreme Court will be in accordance with the supreme Law of the Land, the fact that the Supreme Court claims that something is the Law of the Land does not make it so. There is nothing that physically prevents the justices on the Supreme Court from issuing decisions which are contrary to the Supreme Law of the Land. Any decisions which are patently contrary to the Constitution of the United States are illegitimate and should be recognized as such.
10 posted on 04/22/2013 4:36:11 PM PDT by supercat (Renounce Covetousness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Great post!


13 posted on 04/23/2013 5:01:16 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson