Skip to comments.
Boston bombing suspects did not have valid handgun licenses
Reuters ^
| Apr 21, 2013
Posted on 04/22/2013 6:09:28 AM PDT by Gamecock
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
To: MrB
Hey, wait, let’s just say it’s against the law to kill someone! While we're at it, let's just outlaw abuse of dope and hard drugs too.
Along with speeding, wife beating and pedophilia.
41
posted on
04/22/2013 7:23:26 AM PDT
by
Iron Munro
(Welcome to Obama-Land - EVERYTHING NOT FORBIDDEN IS COMPULSORY)
To: Gamecock
Criminals do not apply for licenses.
42
posted on
04/22/2013 7:37:52 AM PDT
by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
To: immadashell
The real question here is: “Why weren’t they arrested?” Aren’t we protected by the laws? Isn’t the Police Department supposed to “protect” us? Exactly!
All you ever hear from liberals is "We need more laws!" Why don't they ever say, "We need to ENFORCE more laws!"?
To: Gamecock
Anyone notice the news blackout on the types of firearms the bombers had?
Usually the MSM would be plastering photos of them everywhere while calling for the Senate to revote on the AW ban that failed.
44
posted on
04/22/2013 8:01:57 AM PDT
by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(Do we now register our pressure cookers?)
To: Gamecock
Ohhhh...he’s in REAL trouble now!!!
45
posted on
04/22/2013 8:03:17 AM PDT
by
Dick Bachert
(CONGRESS, GROW A PAIR. IMPEACH THE USURPER!!)
To: Gamecock
That’s easy to fix. Let’s pass a law against possessing a handgun without a handgun license.
There otta be a law against it.
To: Gamecock
They probably got them from a mosque that got them from eric hoilder in a failed “sting operation”. Yep... like that has never happened before!
LLS
47
posted on
04/22/2013 8:25:20 AM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
To: yldstrk
Well, it lends credence to the assertion that gun control laws primarily constrain already law abiding citizens.
48
posted on
04/22/2013 8:28:12 AM PDT
by
andyk
(I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
To: Gamecock
Al Reuters is getting better than The Onion...
49
posted on
04/22/2013 8:31:48 AM PDT
by
El Laton Caliente
(NRA Life Member & www.Gunsnet.net Moderator)
To: Gamecock
Let's get serious, if they are not going to obey explosive laws, laws against murder, laws against terrorism, who thinks that firearms (aka gun control) laws would stop them in their tracks?
If these guys carjack to get a vehicle, if they are willing to murder police in cold blood, what kind of law would keep them from getting their hands on firearms?
Anyone who says this is an example of why we need tighter firearm laws, should be laughed off the planet and asked if the USA would have been better in Boston on April 15th with tighter firearm laws or tighter immigration laws?
50
posted on
04/22/2013 8:35:04 AM PDT
by
Robert357
(D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
To: Gamecock
What a surprise! Who would have thought it? How dumb are these reporters a Reuters? Grrrrr.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson