I think the “Enemy Combatant” would have a military trial, so no, not public. I see no justification for doing it, frankly, unless one is looking for a pretext to make this a federal crime so he can be fried.
But let’s get back to the original article for a second. It’s about Lindsey Graham and John McCain wanting to declare this guy an “enemy combatant.” Why would they say that? It’s to protect their precious amnesty plan is why. It’s a diversion. And apparently it’s working, just read upthread for a while.
Thank you for your reply.. And your correct, I’ll consider this again with the amnesty angle. I learn here every day!