Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kevkrom
There is no "magic phrase" that makes that any more or less legitimate than a so-called formal declaration of war.

Then why not simply ask for a declaration of war?

I'll tell you why. Because since 1945, both Presidents and Congress have wanted to take the easy way out. Presidents want the complete freedom to act, and Congress doesn't want to take the responsibility to declare war.

If I'm wrong, please correct me. But please include in your response an answer to the above question: If you're going to go to war, why not simply ask for a declaration of war?

88 posted on 04/19/2013 7:47:34 AM PDT by Leaning Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: Leaning Right

Yes, you’re wrong. First of all, in the case of Afghanistan, there was no nation-state to declare war on, but rather an organization (Taliban). One could argue that they were one and the same, but the Taliban wasn’t in complete control of Afghanistan, IIRC.

Secondly, you’re arguing syntax when the semantics are the same. If Congress authorized the commander in chief to deploy the military for an objective, it doesn’t matter if they use specific magic words or not. The granting of authority is the end result.


91 posted on 04/19/2013 8:12:32 AM PDT by kevkrom (If a wise man has an argument with a foolish man, the fool only rages or laughs...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson