What is ANONYMOUS trying to tell us by including these images in his "pictorial essay" on the Boston bombing?
Red/blue "SPIDERMAN" looks like undercover cop with hidden video in backpack (since he keeps wearing backpack on his forearm, pointing it around). Anonymous outlines a spot on SPIDEY's backpack, probably video peephole.
Also, red/blue is easiest combo to see from a distance, for example by roof spotters.
SPIDERMAN really can't be a suspect, b/c if you're about to commit a crime in public, you don't wear bright red unless you're the dumbest person on earth.
It appears that SPIDERMAN is following "BLACK + BLUE" (the 2 moslem-looking guys on cover of NYPost), surveiling them.
But then ANONYMOUS starts including these odd images, and I'm trying to understand why.
The best I can guess is that SPIDERMAN isn't the ONLY undercover security in this image.
To one side of SPIDERMAN, we notice ORANGE STRIPE, OAKLEY (sunglasses), SPOOKY KID. To the other side (and behind) SPIDERMAN, we notice VLADIMIR (russian hitman-looking guy in black jacket and thinning hair).
Are they gathered to assist the "Takedown" of the 2 (alleged) suspects, BLACK + BLUE, if the suspects pull some violent stunt?
WHY does ANONYMOUS include this separate shot of only SPOOKY KID, ORANGE STRIPE, and OAKLEY? What's the point of this shot? Could SPOOKY KID be a small but over-18 undercover "accesory" to one of the undercover cops to help them blend in as a "family?" SPOOKY KID is freaking me out.
WHY WAS THIS PHOTO INCLUDED?
WIDER SHOT