Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Letís hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American
Salon ^ | 4/16/2013 | David Sirota

Posted on 04/16/2013 7:16:57 PM PDT by Altura Ct.

As we now move into the official Political Aftermath period of the Boston bombing — the period that will determine the long-term legislative fallout of the atrocity — the dynamics of privilege will undoubtedly influence the nation’s collective reaction to the attacks. That’s because privilege tends to determine: 1) which groups are — and are not — collectively denigrated or targeted for the unlawful actions of individuals; and 2) how big and politically game-changing the overall reaction ends up being.

This has been most obvious in the context of recent mass shootings. In those awful episodes, a religious or ethnic minority group lacking such privilege would likely be collectively slandered and/or targeted with surveillance or profiling (or worse) if some of its individuals comprised most of the mass shooters. However, white male privilege means white men are not collectively denigrated/targeted for those shootings — even though most come at the hands of white dudes.

Likewise, in the context of terrorist attacks, such privilege means white non-Islamic terrorists are typically portrayed not as representative of whole groups or ideologies, but as “lone wolf” threats to be dealt with as isolated law enforcement matters. Meanwhile, non-white or developing-world terrorism suspects are often reflexively portrayed as representative of larger conspiracies, ideologies and religions that must be dealt with as systemic threats — the kind potentially requiring everything from law enforcement action to military operations to civil liberties legislation to foreign policy shifts.

“White privilege is knowing that even if the bomber turns out to be white, no one will call for your group to be profiled as terrorists as a result, subjected to special screening or threatened with deportation,” writes author Tim Wise. “White privilege is knowing that if this bomber turns out to be white, the United States government will not bomb whatever corn field or mountain town or stale suburb from which said bomber came, just to ensure that others like him or her don’t get any ideas. And if he turns out to be a member of the Irish Republican Army we won’t bomb Dublin. And if he’s an Italian-American Catholic we won’t bomb the Vatican.”

Because of these undeniable and pervasive double standards, the specific identity of the Boston Marathon bomber (or bombers) is not some minor detail — it will almost certainly dictate what kind of governmental, political and societal response we see in the coming weeks. That means regardless of your particular party affiliation, if you care about everything from stopping war to reducing the defense budget to protecting civil liberties to passing immigration reform, you should hope the bomber was a white domestic terrorist. Why? Because only in that case will privilege work to prevent the Boston attack from potentially undermining progress on those other issues.

To know that’s true is to simply consider how America reacts to different kinds of terrorism.

Though FBI data show fewer terrorist plots involving Muslims than terrorist plots involving non-Muslims, America has mobilized a full-on war effort exclusively against the prospect of Islamic terrorism. Indeed, the moniker “War on Terrorism” has come to specifically mean “War on Islamic Terrorism,” involving everything from new laws like the Patriot Act, to a new torture regime, to new federal agencies like the Transportation Security Administration and Department of Homeland Security, to wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to mass surveillance of Muslim communities.

By contrast, even though America has seen a consistent barrage of attacks from domestic non-Islamic terrorists, the privilege and double standards baked into our national security ideologies means those attacks have resulted in no systemic action of the scope marshaled against foreign terrorists. In fact, it has been quite the opposite — according to Darryl Johnson, the senior domestic terrorism analyst at the Department of Homeland Security, the conservative movement backlash to merely reporting the rising threat of such domestic terrorism resulted in DHS seriously curtailing its initiatives against that particular threat. (Irony alert: When it comes specifically to fighting white non-Muslim domestic terrorists, the right seems to now support the very doctrine it criticized Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry for articulating — the doctrine that sees fighting terrorism as primarily “an intelligence-gathering, law-enforcement, public-diplomacy effort” and not something more systemic.)

Enter the Boston bombing. Coming at the very moment the U.S. government is planning to withdraw from Afghanistan, considering cuts to the Pentagon budget, discussing civil liberties principles and debating landmark immigration legislation, the attack could easily become the fulcrum of all of those contentious policy debates — that is, depending on the demographic profile of the assailant.

If recent history is any guide, if the bomber ends up being a white anti-government extremist, white privilege will likely mean the attack is portrayed as just an isolated incident — one that has no bearing on any larger policy debates. Put another way, white privilege will work to not only insulate whites from collective blame, but also to insulate the political debate from any fallout from the attack.

It will probably be much different if the bomber ends up being a Muslim and/or a foreigner from the developing world. As we know from our own history, when those kind of individuals break laws in such a high-profile way, America often cites them as both proof that entire demographic groups must be targeted, and that therefore a more systemic response is warranted. At that point, it’s easy to imagine conservatives citing Boston as a reason to block immigration reform defense spending cuts and the Afghan War withdrawal and to further expand surveillance and other encroachments on civil liberties.

If that sounds hard to believe, just look at yesterday’s comments by right-wing radio host Laura Ingraham, whose talking points often become Republican Party doctrine. Though authorities haven’t even identified a suspect in the Boston attack, she (like other conservatives) seems to already assume the assailant is foreign, and is consequently citing the attack as rationale to slam the immigration reform bill.

The same Laura Ingraham, of course, was one of the leading voices criticizing the Department of Homeland Security for daring to even report on right-wing domestic terrorism. In that sense, she perfectly embodies the double standard that, more than anything, will determine the long-term political impact of the Boston bombing.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: agitprop; antiamericanism; antisemite; antiwhite; blamethewhiteguy; boston; collectivism; davidsirota; hateamericaleft; journalista; lauraingraham; liberalbigot; marathon; proislamist; racism; reverseracism; whitemales; whiteprivilege; whiteymustpay
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-148 next last

1 posted on 04/16/2013 7:16:57 PM PDT by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

Let’s hope that it’s a Bill Errs philosophical progeny.


2 posted on 04/16/2013 7:18:07 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

If he’s a white American, he will probably be a leftist. Remember, Bill Ayers is a white American.


3 posted on 04/16/2013 7:19:06 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

4 posted on 04/16/2013 7:19:38 PM PDT by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

That didn’t take long ...


5 posted on 04/16/2013 7:20:14 PM PDT by 11th_VA (DRONES DON'T KILL, CINCs KILL ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

What is this...I don’t even...


6 posted on 04/16/2013 7:21:09 PM PDT by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

He might be white, but he’s no American.


7 posted on 04/16/2013 7:21:10 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

A WASP, like Bill Ayers?


8 posted on 04/16/2013 7:21:24 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

Let’s hope the dumb asses that work for Salon grow a brain, we all know that will never happen


9 posted on 04/16/2013 7:21:47 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

The leftwing extremists just can’t get over that skin color thing.


10 posted on 04/16/2013 7:21:58 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Dude! Where's my Bill of Rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

Simple minds seek simple solutions.


11 posted on 04/16/2013 7:22:01 PM PDT by shawnlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.
FBI data show fewer terrorist plots involving Muslims than terrorist plots involving non-Muslims,

Really? I dont remember any other group knocking down skyscrapers or blowing up part of the pentagon.

12 posted on 04/16/2013 7:24:35 PM PDT by beebuster2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.; All
No doubt it's some Far Right Wing Prepper Wacko that owns one of these:

Do you own a Blue Book? You are a suspect.

13 posted on 04/16/2013 7:24:39 PM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

They grasp desperately for a reason to unleash a domestic war and murder all Christian Americans. This recent bombing is probably not sufficient reason, but they will keep trying.


14 posted on 04/16/2013 7:24:42 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The ballot box is a sham. Nothing will change until after the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.
Racism is OK when they do it.
15 posted on 04/16/2013 7:25:38 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth." --Alan Greenspan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

Killed and maimed white Americans though. Coinkidink? Don’t think so.
JMHO.


16 posted on 04/16/2013 7:26:14 PM PDT by acapesket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

Sorry, but I couldn’t read through that. It sickend me to know that Salon is not kidding. They do hope its a White American.


17 posted on 04/16/2013 7:27:40 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.
If the guy is available, I need some horse processed hay for my garden. Because that's what this is. He seems to have plenty of it.

/johnny

18 posted on 04/16/2013 7:27:44 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

Well there it is... the truth comes out. The libs want it to be a white guy to push their agenda. I hope its not a white male. I hope its a foreigner. In fact, I hope its a Muslim. But MOST of all... I hope they find the right person or persons who did this, regardless of who they are.


19 posted on 04/16/2013 7:28:10 PM PDT by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.
"Of course, not all my conversations in immigrant communities follow this easy pattern. In the wake of 9/11, my meetings with Arab and Pakistani Americans, for example, have a more urgent quality, for the stories of detentions and FBI questioning and hard stares from neighbors have shaken their sense of security and belonging. They have been reminded that the history of immigration in this country has a dark underbelly; they need specific reassurances that their citizenship really means something, that America has learned the right lessons from the Japanese internments during World War II, and that I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."

~Barack Hussein Obama

20 posted on 04/16/2013 7:28:34 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson