To: Perdogg
The case is not ripe yet. Someone actually has to be hurt by the law first.
2 posted on
04/15/2013 7:33:19 AM PDT by
Timber Rattler
(Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
To: Timber Rattler
The Constitution says ‘shall not be infringed’. How is requiring governmental permission to keep and bear not infringing on the Constitutionally defined right? Simply writing a law to require government permission is harming by infringing. What is really at play is the unSCOTUS preparing to nullify the Constitution by fiat ruling. Which will be amusing since the Heller ruling.
31 posted on
04/15/2013 8:58:59 AM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Being deceived can be cured.)
To: Timber Rattler
The case is not ripe yet. Someone actually has to be hurt by the law first. Yes, because depriving the rights of millions of people is just standard policy for 'our' government.
39 posted on
04/15/2013 9:49:10 AM PDT by
zeugma
(Those of us who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.)
To: Timber Rattler
When some one is injured, we can only hope that the family of the injured seek redress upon the Legislature.
48 posted on
04/15/2013 11:29:50 PM PDT by
Hoosier-Daddy
( "It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson