Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/12/2013 12:43:11 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan

SCOTUS ping.


2 posted on 04/12/2013 1:03:24 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
“The justices have to be cognizant of the politics of guns at this moment in time"?

Why? The Bill of Rights wasn't intended to be subject to the whims of public opinion.

3 posted on 04/12/2013 1:14:23 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Kachalsky case. It’s messed up at the district court level because they said that because Heller didn’t say whether defense outside the home was a core second amendment right, therefore they could use intermediary scrutiny to decide whether NY could deny CC unless you could prove you had an actual threat to your life ongoing, like a stalker or something.

But I read the decision and it sure sounds like rational basis. For those from rio linda, that means the court defers to the legislature as long as they come up with some plausible excuse for the law. Strict scrutiny would be the better standard, but Heller was unclear, and as my con law prof taught us, courts often confuse intermediate scrutiny with rational basis. So this mess was somewhat predictable, given how narrowly Heller was structured, í.e., could DC make a handgun in the home virtually useless for spontaneous self defense. No, they can’t. But what about every other scenario, like outside the home? No clear guidance. A good scotus decision in kachalsky would resolve that ambiguity.


4 posted on 04/12/2013 1:19:40 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

We are without a doubt living in a state of tyranny in NY and that is NO hyperbole.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/11/oops-new-york-state-police-admit-to-big-mistake-in-gun-confiscation-case/

Finally the state police (NY Stasi) admit today, after they lied for a day, that confiscation was wrong.

Here is the real meat of the story: Cuomo and his Gestapo NYS Police chief along with... wait for it.... DHS have formed a working group to find a way to violate the 4th Amendment and HIPA laws so they can confiscate guns in NY. The 4th amendment and HIPA were violated in this case and Cuomo has seen his presidential hopes go up in flames.

It is a test case to see if this can be done on a national level.

Right now the only person in NYS who can investigate Cuomo and his mafia is Shelllllldon Silver and he, being the good communist will do no such thing.

Therefore, we are living in tyranny in NYS as we have no law, no law enforcement, no legislature to protect us from government and the government has, this week turned on its own citizens. No sane person should register his/her guns in NY nor in the rest of the USA.

To my knowledge, NY has no citizens militia to keep the government in check. Those of us in upstate NY just have to go along with the communists in NYC.


9 posted on 04/12/2013 3:33:00 PM PDT by Wurlitzer (Nothing says "ignorance" like Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Damn right we have special needs for self-protection: we’re human beings!

The 4th Circuit recently upheld Maryland’s strict “good and substantial reason” law.

Maryland “Freak State” PING!


11 posted on 04/13/2013 1:06:32 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Drag Me From Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson