Then why is he for homosexual marriage?
He's not. Can you show us a link that supports your claim?
posted on 04/10/2013 10:20:06 AM PDT
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
He can’t, because it’s a lie. The Bushbots are out in full force.
To: Responsibility2nd; BarnacleCenturion
“I think right now if we say
we’re only going to [have] one man, one woman marriage, we’re going to lose that battle because the country is going the other way right now,” Paul said. “If we’re to say each state can decide, I think a good 25 or 30 states still do believe in traditional marriage, and maybe we allow that debate to go on for another couple of decades.”
posted on 04/10/2013 11:03:41 AM PDT
(We are conservatives. Not libertarians, not "fiscal conservatives", not moderates)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson