Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: frogjerk
Then why is he for homosexual marriage?

He's not. Can you show us a link that supports your claim?

47 posted on 04/10/2013 10:20:06 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Responsibility2nd

He can’t, because it’s a lie. The Bushbots are out in full force.


48 posted on 04/10/2013 10:28:00 AM PDT by BarnacleCenturion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd; BarnacleCenturion

“I think right now if we say…we’re only going to [have] one man, one woman marriage, we’re going to lose that battle because the country is going the other way right now,” Paul said. “If we’re to say each state can decide, I think a good 25 or 30 states still do believe in traditional marriage, and maybe we allow that debate to go on for another couple of decades.”

http://www.businessinsider.com/rand-paul-gay-marriage-brody-file-cbn-2013-4


54 posted on 04/10/2013 11:03:41 AM PDT by frogjerk (We are conservatives. Not libertarians, not "fiscal conservatives", not moderates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson