Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arizona Bill Nullifies the NDAA, Protecting Citizens' Civil Liberties
The New American ^ | Apr. 10, 2013 | Joe Wolverton, II, J.D.

Posted on 04/10/2013 7:39:13 AM PDT by EXCH54FE

The Arizona House of Representatives will not cooperate with the federal government in denying due process to citizens of the Grand Canyon State.

By a vote of 34 to 24, the House passed HB 2573, a bill that would, among other things, prevent state officials from participating in the indefinite detention of Americans by the president as authorized by the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 (NDAA).

The measure would amend Title 41 of the Arizona code by adding a section prohibiting state governmental compliance with unconstitutional federal mandates.

A majority of Arizona’s state lawmakers recognize that Arizona is, along with her 49 sister states, a sovereign entity endowed with what James Madison described as “numerous and indefinite powers.” The federal government, on the other hand, possesses only “few and defined” powers, Madison wrote in The Federalist, No. 45.

Thankfully, there are yet found among the nation’s hundreds of elected state and local representatives a small but well-informed minority that understands and appreciates that concept and the significant role states are designed to play in the defense of liberty.

One such official is Arizona state Representative Carl Seel (R-Phoenix), HB 2573’s chief sponsor.

"Every public officer is required to uphold the Constitution not only of the United States [but], in our case, the state of Arizona as well," Seel said, as quoted in the Arizona Daily Star. The article goes on to quote Seel explaining that his bill "best reflects preserving, where possible, the individual civil liberties."

While text of the bill lays out specific ways in which the NDAA denies citizens of many of the most basic constitutionally protected civil liberties, the surprising scope of the NDAA is unfamiliar to many.

(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: guncontrol; ndaa; secondamendment; statesrights

1 posted on 04/10/2013 7:39:13 AM PDT by EXCH54FE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE
Arizona in my opinion the only State is the 50 that understand the roll of the Federal Government and is willing to put in law bills that kick the Feds in the butt. Texas is close but they just have too many communists Democrats that sometimes ties the State in knots.
2 posted on 04/10/2013 7:47:20 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

Then why do they keep electing McCain?


3 posted on 04/10/2013 7:48:59 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE
As President Obama continues accumulating all legislative, executive, and judicial power, the need for nullification is urgent, and liberty-minded citizens are encouraged to see state legislators boldly asserting their right to restrain the federal government through application of that very powerful and very constitutional principle.

Informative article.

In the war against encroaching leftist statism, our first bullet should be nullification.

I'm proud of my home state! Go AZ!

4 posted on 04/10/2013 7:50:02 AM PDT by Flycatcher (God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

and who the hell are the 24 who voted the wrong way????


5 posted on 04/10/2013 7:51:39 AM PDT by raygunfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

Is tar-and-feather'ing too good for the 24 that voted to nullify Constitutionally protected rights?


6 posted on 04/10/2013 8:11:54 AM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity
"Then why do they keep electing McCain?"

That may be the Question Of The Year!

7 posted on 04/10/2013 8:23:23 AM PDT by Pablo64 (What part of "Shall not be infringed" do you not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: circlecity
Because McCain has the money to run a multimillion dollar smear campaign against any credible primary opponent. Not to mention that voters are fools.
8 posted on 04/10/2013 8:51:07 AM PDT by c-b 1 (Reporting from behind enemy lines, in occupied AZTLAN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

Wouldn’t want to give up the power of a “senior senator” would they?

I’ve heard this from a Nebraskan back in the early 2000’s - they wouldn’t want to vote against their incumbant democrat senator because they’d be giving up too much power in the senate.


9 posted on 04/10/2013 8:54:30 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

Is this why the WH and DOJ go after Arizona so aggressively? (When other states are taking steps to protect sovereignty).


10 posted on 04/10/2013 8:57:53 AM PDT by CPO retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

“Then why do they keep electing McCain?”

Open Primaries and Vote Fraud.


11 posted on 04/10/2013 9:02:40 AM PDT by Mechanicos (When did we amend the Constitution for a 2nd Federal Prohibition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

Obviously your not following the 10th amendment Center States across the Federation are standing up against NDAA and a host of other federal usurpation.

Years of hard work among 10thers and other conservatives has succeeded in building the foundation of a rebellion against Washington tyranny among our States legislator’s.

We must encourage and fuel this rebellion against tyranny to see to it that it grows in both strength and number until it has the power to stop this evil before it consumes us.

http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/04/08/liberty-preservation-the-states-say-no-to-ndaa/


12 posted on 04/10/2013 12:49:42 PM PDT by Monorprise (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson