Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zipper
Interesting point - man marrying son. "The interviewer said that would be incest, and therefore illegal — to which Irons responded no it wouldn’t, since the idea behind incest laws is to prevent deformed offspring, "

Maybe incest laws interfere with 'rights'. What next?

52 posted on 04/07/2013 2:47:12 PM PDT by ex-snook (God is Love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: ex-snook
Maybe incest laws interfere with 'rights'. What next?

Exactly! They have corrupted the definition of marriage, and now we all must discover the consequences. The biggest beneficiaries will be lawyers.

84 posted on 04/07/2013 7:15:42 PM PDT by zipper ("The Second Amendment IS my carry permit!" -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson