Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

Yep — it looks like it could be in confidentiality limbo for as long as it is expedient for Crump.

But since the Orlando Sentinel has a copy and has already released some of the information therein, how can they continue to claim confidentiality.

I wonder if O’Mara has his copy yet???


49 posted on 04/08/2013 10:49:54 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Chip
I think the goal was to make the existence of a settlement a news item, and that Crump, the Orlando sentinel, and the clerk of the court were all in on the scheme.

Now the clerk can claim simple error, Crump can say (and probably win) that the material is confidential and was not to be released, and Rene Stutzman can just play "simple error by clerk" or "the press is entitled to it" or whatever suits her pro-Martin agenda. There will be no way to prove it was a scheme, but the circumstances add up to it, plain and simple.

How many other confidential filings were copied for the public after one day in the hopper? How come only five pages?

Anyway, from Crump's point of view, mission accomplished. It was news, and he won;t be found in breach of contract to maintain confidentiality.

50 posted on 04/08/2013 10:59:33 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson