Looks like the gun grabbers want it both ways. If the guns are only very infrequently used by criminals, then how can they also be "the weapon of choice for criminals?"
They can't even keep their lies straight.
I don’t know about him, but I would prefer to outgun the guy who tries to break in. I remember a movie where Alan Lad? plays Jim Bowie. The other guy pulls a knife, and then Bowie pull out HIS knife, which is like a short Roman sword!
Then why do police need ‘assault weapons’? If they need them for self defense from the ‘bad guys’, where are they confronting these ‘bad guys’? In secure areas away from the public or in amongst the public? Who is more likely to be a victim of the ‘assault weapons’ of the ‘bad guys’, the police or the general public? If the police are not legally obligated to protect citizens(USSC Warren vs DC 1981)shouldn’t citizens have the same self defense capability as the police since the ‘bad guys’ are amongst us and not ‘secured’ away?? The powers that be don’t give a damn about your ‘security’. It is about control and the power that comes from it. It is human nature. It is the history of mankind.
When the government is the criminal then the people need all the strength they can muster to resist crime.
They can't even keep their lies straight.
I was just going to post the same thing !!
It's like the global warming bs --- since that is a lie, they now have chosen "climate change" so they can have it every way possible.
UGH -- liberals !!
As Gov, Malloy would say, “uh, well, you see, we, uh, aren’t forcing thews, ummmmm companies to uh, move. We certainly, uh, wish they would, uh, stay, but uhhhhh...”