I saw a comment like that on an IBD article where they were talking about people moving to freer states.
Some screechy fem commented that it depends on how you define freedom. She said that ND had just passed the most restrictive law ever. Apparently for her, “freedom” is defined by how easily you can kill the human consequences of fornication.
“Apparently for her, freedom is defined by how easily you can kill the human consequences of fornication.”
Their God-given “right” to murder their own unborn children.
The leftist freaks aren’t human(e) by any standard.
All they know is Democrat GOOD, Republican BAD, and that the ends justify the means.
I've always been of the opinion that promotion of abortion is a deliberate distraction strategy. The people who push abortion want control over every aspect of everyone's life. They want us to be so convinced that being able to abort our children up to the point where they become financially independent (tiny exaggeration) is proof of how much freedom we have, that we don't notice just how many restrictions they place on just about everything we do.
Similarly, we're supposed to think that medical coverage begins and ends with access to abortion--the intended rationing of every health-related medical service is irrelevant, since we can abort at any time.
I'm not hoodwinked. Ditch the abortion. I'd rather have freedom and my choice of whatever medical procedures I can afford.