[neverdem]

God help us.

May God help us, but we must help ourselves when we can.!

Whether its title or its subtitle is A sensitive matter, this admission by The Economist that, "If climate scientists were credit-rating agencies, climate sensitivity would be on negative watch. But it would not yet be downgraded..." was the kind of story that I made a list for every state and then some.

It's been referenced by a few essays so far:

Michael Barone: The Economist's Emily Litella moment on global warming (Barone thought it was the title too.)

CLIMATE CHANGE ENDGAME IN SIGHT?

The New Climate Deniers

The Economist essay is worth the read and wide dissemination by email, not just a few echo chambers on the right. The Economist was always hawking global warming alarmism!

FReepmail me if you want off of my list.

[Pontiac]

Thanks for the links

[shove_it]

Thanks for the ping. I learned early on that, with my minor in statistics, I had a license to lie.

[Graewoulf]

THERE IS NO KNOWN CAUSE AND EFFECT BETWEEN CO2 AND TEMPERATURE CHANGES !

GLOBAL WARMING IS A FALSE SPECULATION !

[GOPJ]

The Economist notes the work of Ed Hawkins of the University of Reading in Britain. He has found that if global temperatures stay the same for a few more years, they will fall below the range of 20 climate models. In other words, the scientific “consensus” will have been proven wrong.

Thanks for the ping.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[zeestephen]

Politically and financially this is great news.

Weather-wise, I'm not so sure.

For at least half of the last 2.5 million years, the Earth has been in an ice age.

Not a friendly climate for human beings.

15,000 years ago, Seattle, my home, was buried under 3,000 feet of ice.