Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

Most of the “reporters” are Democrat shills.


3 posted on 04/01/2013 1:20:27 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin
Most of the “reporters” are Democrat shills.
True - but the reason isn’t that journalism is in the pocket of the Democrats but that the Democrats are in the pocket of the journalists.

The reporters and their employers all belong to the same union - it’s called the Associated Press. When formed, the AP had a legitimate-sounding purpose - to conserve bandwidth in the transmission of news nationwide. But it also homogenized journalism. That gave journalism unity and power to pursue its own agenda - which is, naturally, to persuade the public of journalism’s own virtue. Journalism pursues its agenda by zealously criticizing and second guessing the people who don’t merely talk but who work to a bottom line and actually do stuff. And journalism promotes the political party which goes along and gets along with that - and smears politicians who do not.

Journalists have the prudence to avoid labeling themselves “wise,” since that would make them extremely vulnerable to charges of sophistry. But they use the term “objectivity” to exactly the same effect. It is impossible for a person to know that he - or someone he agrees with - is objective, just as it is impossible to know that his own opinion is wise. Only time will reveal that. Claiming otherwise is sophistry.

7 posted on 04/01/2013 3:54:42 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (“Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson