A Natural Fit Useless Mismatch Odd Couple
Posted on 03/28/2013 4:27:22 PM PDT by NKP_Vet
Said O'Reilly:
The compelling argument is on the side of homosexuals. That's where the compelling argument is. 'We're Americans, we just want to be treated like everybody else.' That’s a compelling argument. And to deny that, you’ve got to have a very strong argument on the other side. And the other side hasn’t been able to do anything but thump the Bible."
Adding:
I support civil unions, I always have. Alright. The gay marriage thing, I don’t feel that strongly about it one way or the other
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/03/bill-oreilly-gay-marriage-evolution-timeline.html
http://www.taftmidwaydriller.com/article/20130327/NEWS/303279965
http://tv.yahoo.com/news/stephen-colbert-lampoons-bill-oreilly-flip-flopping-gay-180935910.html
http://www.goodasyou.org/good_as_you/2013/03/megyn-kelly-bill-oreilly-say-tony-perkins-has-no-credible-argument-time4marriage.html
http://www.lajuntatribunedemocrat.com/article/20130327/NEWS/303279965
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
He has his wet finger up in the air, testing the breeze, and he can see which way things are going.
He simply doesn't want to get caught behind the wave of change. I'd even bet that he personally doesn't agree with it, but he's not a man of any strong conviction as HE PRETENDS TO BE.
He's lost me, most of the time. I rarely watch him. I learn nothing from either him, nor his guests, and I don't appreciate the acrimonious "debate" (what debate?!) on his show.
O'Reilly is a faux populist. A wet-fingered, faux populist. Not a true conservative.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
We don’t need to “thump the Bible.” It’s called science and reason. The marital relationship between a man and a woman is fundamentally different than any other kind of union- it’s simple anthropology.It’s the other side that is denying science... Just like they do with abortion.
Someone oughta thump Bill O. The sanctimonious personna wore thin long ago.
That’s BOR for ya.
The great general who leads us to the site of his surrender again and again and again.
BOR needs to never go to church again.
New International Version (NIV)
13 “‘If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads. Too bad it doesn't say the same about supporters of this 'act'.
He's getting to the point where someone will ask, What's the frequency, Kenneth?
Maybe Bill is waiting for this day to become legal:
Leviticus 20:15
"If a man has sexual relations with an animal, he is to be put to death, and you must kill the animal.
I don't know why the animal has to die although I don't think I would eat any part of it after its 'encounter'. BaaaaAAAAA!!!!
At least the others like Biden and Pelosi are bold and brave enough to openly endorse homo "marriage" and the unnatural sexual intercourse that goes with it.
But not the most craven weasel in the public eye, the Great Bloviator himself. He still refuses to call Obama a "socialist". BOR is slowly digging his own grave, believe me....and he's too arrogant and full of himself to know it.
Leni
For me O’Reilly slid into the land of used to be a long time ago. He is a person I used to listen to and used to watch. Now, I will never and I mean never listen to another word that comes out of his mouth. He is more interested in being a Washington insider than doing what is right. He has often mentioned his childhood. He had a good father and mother who made him what he is today. Now, he says that you don’t really need a mother, a gay guy will do, and you don’t really need a father, a lesbian will do. This idea is selfish and self-centered. Shame on you Bill. Shame on you!
I used to think that Rush was being a little harsh to call O’Reilly “Ted Baxter.”
Now I believe that Rush was dead-on correct about the pompous O’Reilly. Bill caters to the politically correct crowd. The creator of the no-spin zone is being spun like a top.
BOR is POS
A Natural Fit Useless Mismatch Odd Couple
The onus is on homosexuals. If it is a rights issue, and they do have a legitimate grievance that is very American “equality”, then they have to prove that there is a real harm. Same sex civil unions in IL are not even 2 years old. They came into effect June 1, 2011, yet homosexual marriage is being pushe here.
That was the compromise over legal equality. Where’s the continuing harm?
And in related threads:
Bill O'Reilly 'Caught Cheating' in Child Custody Battle
Bill O'Reilly: The Bible contradicts itself
Bill O’Reilly dissented from his Church on contraception.
There’s a straight line from contraception to endorsing same-sex. Once you separate procreation from sex you have no real argument against homosexual sex.
Protestant Evangelicals will either have to reconsider their blank check on contraception and continue to oppose homosexual acts
or keep their love for contraception and jump on the homosexual bandwagon.
The sifting process is in full flood.
Catholics who dissent on contraception are doing the same thing. Once you embrace one unnatural act (contraception) you have no real basis for opposing other unnatural acts.
Levin took him apart quite nicely on this last night
Another pretend catholic.
He’ll continue pumping up his ad revenues.
Why ahyone would think that wasn’t the most important thing to him is beyond me.
Perverts are great for ad revenue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.