Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Read this from National Review: Obama’s Manufacturing Plan, Upside Down

It's not as simple as it's a trend around the world:

It’s not, as some hypothesize, related to changes in trade balance (imports vs. exports), etc. Rather, as the authors of the book explain, it’s basically due to consistent productivity growth that allows industrialized economies to turn out the same amount of goods with a smaller workforce. Now, Matthews’s post is entitled “This chart will change how you think about manufacturing” — maybe it should or shouldn’t, but it probably wouldn’t if you’d read Jim Manzi’s piece in National Affairs in 2010, which actually made the same point, with a remarkably similar chart:

What this means is that the president’s campaign plan to revive America’s labor force with manufacturing employment almost certainly won’t work — leaving aside the fact that it’s also quite poor economic policy to encourage any particular sector, but least of all one that just happens to make people feel warm and patriotic.

16 posted on 03/28/2013 6:37:56 AM PDT by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Wyatt's Torch

I’ll give you a hint:

Last I heard, China’s unemployment rate was 4.1%.

We are subsidizing, and constantly strengthening the Chinese worker.

China now exports more than America.

We are due to fall the number 2 in world trade, by the NEXT ELECTION.

Wake up people. We are doing it wrong.


17 posted on 03/28/2013 6:40:56 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson