An animal does not have the mental capacity to engage in consensual sex with a human. They are driven by instinct, not reason. On the other hand, if sexual preference is the prime concern, then how can one possibly argue against polygamy, polyandry, or any other consensual human grouping? If we’re going to deny reality and say a man’s preference for sodomy is equivalent to heterosexual, aka natural sexual attractions, then let’s be truly fair about it. Any grouping, so long as they are all consenting adults, should be able to declare their eternal love for each other. To do anything else would be to deny equal protection under the law. If preference is it, the key factor, then why should a homo’s preference be given any special protection over a bisexual’s or a guy that wants a harem?
Many of today’s practitioners of sex today are doing so strictly on instinct. Why it’s mere instinct that causes a homosexual to jump on the backside of his partner in order to stick his pee-pee in the other’s poo-poo.
And that isn’t all. Usually their activity they call love ends up with the one partner shoving his head up the other’s backside, then licking off the dipstick. And they wonder why they get sick and die of AIDs.
This is the beautiful thing they call love and they want to get married like normal sane people so their kids, allowed to be adopted by two sick perverts, will feel like they have two parents.