Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mountainlion

As one analyst said about this case it is not the Constitutionality of gay marriage that is being debated, it is the Constitutionality of traditional marriage that is being debated. If the Court overturns traditional marriage then I expect them to rule in such a way that a polygamy case doesn’t have to come before them. They can do so by stating that the state has no vested interest in limits on any marriages between consenting adults.

Given that Hugh Hefner and Charlie Sheen and no end of urban black men can openly practice polygamy then why can’t anyone else?


14 posted on 03/27/2013 1:21:23 PM PDT by MeganC (The left have so twisted public perceptions that the truth now appears pornographic.- SpaceBar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: MeganC

That’s serial polygamy, they want traditional one groom, three brides polygamy.


17 posted on 03/27/2013 1:23:17 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: MeganC
Just being sarcastic about what the “wise latino” said. Obama leaned on the court on obamashare so what is law will have less to do with the decision than politics.
21 posted on 03/27/2013 1:28:12 PM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: MeganC

How would that stave off polygamy?


146 posted on 03/28/2013 2:09:43 AM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson