Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrB

Doesn’t take much interpretation to think that it took 100,000 years for light to reach us from an object 100000 light years away. But it takes a lot of lame excuses and hand waving to make it conform to the answer anywhere close to where the creationist already knows a priori that it just has to be!


22 posted on 03/27/2013 11:43:43 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream

We’re also seeing light from stars further out than the atheists’ estimation of the age of creation.


26 posted on 03/27/2013 11:47:42 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: allmendream
Doesn’t take much interpretation to think that it took 100,000 years for light to reach us from an object 100000 light years away.

Always the a priori assumptions that fowl the argument ...

The Genesis text says the stars were created to mark times and seasons ... if the photon stream from the stars to the earth were not part of the creation then the light from the stars couldn't be used to mark times and seasons.

34 posted on 03/27/2013 12:00:19 PM PDT by dartuser (My firearm is not illegal ... its undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson