No offense, but in a contest between your legal opinion and Mark Levin’s legal opinion, I’ll go with the constitutional lawyer.
No offense, but Mark Levin does not know what SCOTUS will do. Neither do you. Neither do I. There is no precedent.
Mark Levin may believe that SCOTUS should do (and if I heard his reasoning, I would probably agree with it), but, hey, we were ALL surprised with Roberts' ruling on Obamacare, weren't we?
Until there is a precedent set, we will just not know. And I'd rather work to protect against a nasty surprise than be a lemming.