Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Darren McCarty

I don’t think that is practical. There are literally tens of millions of government recognized contracts that are already in application that rely on the consistent legal definition of those terms.

There are also, at any moment, thousands of cases before the courts involving said contracts.

Just getting the government out of it would be a legal nightmare and a boom for lawyers redrafting millions of private contracts.

Marriage is a legal term and thus is under the jurisdiction of the government to define for consistent application.

Of course, there is also the Ex Post Facto issue regarding a recognized contract that is no longer recognized.


14 posted on 03/26/2013 6:59:18 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: mnehring

Homo marriage is coming. If not now, certainly in the near future. I only hope they get hosed in divorce court like a whole bunch of us heterosexuals have.


18 posted on 03/26/2013 7:07:11 PM PDT by umgud (2A can't survive dem majorities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

In that case, lawyers would love the concept of government withdrawal on the matter - virtually limitless fountain of work.


25 posted on 03/26/2013 7:18:45 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson