Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Longbow1969

Wait - why’s this the “opposite of a bailout,” therefore good?

This is theft of deposits and shareholder worth, pure and simple.


34 posted on 03/28/2013 5:47:14 PM PDT by 4Liberty (Some on our "Roads & Bridges" head to the beach. Others head to their offices, farms, libraries....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: 4Liberty

Theft by whom? The bank(s) have failed. The only people that actually deserve their money are the insured depositors. And that is exactly who is NOT getting wiped out or taking a huge haircut - the insured depositors. There is no good solution here. This one is just better than going directly to the taxpayers to bail out yet more banks. In this case the shareholders in the “bad” banks lose everything - just like shareholders in other bankrupt company lose their shirt. That’s how it should work. Uninsured depositors (deposit amounts over 100k Euro) are going a lot of money, but that’s better than losing ALL their money. Everyone knew these banks were in serious trouble, and they knew it for a long time now. Shareholders and big depositors just bet on the resolution being another typical tax payer financed bailout, the were wrong.


35 posted on 03/28/2013 6:24:10 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson