Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pinkbell

I originally believed they would rule in favor of gay marriage. Today’s discussion at SCOTUS on the question of standing gives me pause. I think, in this particular case, the court is looking for a way to leave this issue for The People to hash out themselves.

Justice Ginsburg, in particular, has questioned the handling of Roe v. Wade by the Court. Many experts believe that abortion laws were already changing in the states and that SCOTUS shortcut the democratic process by which laws should be passed.


57 posted on 03/26/2013 12:16:14 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan
What you hear is the liberal agenda saying 'marriage equality'. What they're really saying is 'religion equality', which really means legislating that no religion shall condemn homosexuality- which REALLY means, all you Christian bigots, too damn bad what you believe, we can do whatever the hell we want in your church and you can't do a damn thing about it.

This is where this is going. When a Chrisitan church denies performing a homosexual marriage, lawsuits will abound- and Christianity will NOT win.

Nevermind about Islam. Christians ARE the enemy.

72 posted on 03/26/2013 2:30:49 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson