Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

General Dempsey NPR Interview 25 March 2013
NPR Interview | vanity

Posted on 03/26/2013 9:01:04 AM PDT by binreadin

Did anyone else hear Gen Dempsey's interview on NPR yesterday afternoon? He said that they had to bring women into combat, as only one in four young males in our nation were eligible for enlistment due to the national dropout rate and the increased number of legal problems experienced in the young male demographic. Therefore, they had to allow women to enter previously restricted combat fields in order to meet the military requirements. He stated that the physical standards for these fields needed to be "dusted off" and re-examined, as it might be possible that intellectual and other personal attributes might be more important.

No mention at all of perhaps letting some of these guys with minor legal histories join, as they did a few years back. If they think they had more problems with them, can you imagine the problems they are going to have with morale, injury, harassment and rape they are going to experience with women on the front lines bearing a significant brunt of the fighting?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boyseducation; combat; dempsey; educatingboys; education; eligiblemen; eligiblesoldiers; maleseducation; military; women; womenincombat
Anyone else hear this? I did not link to NPR as I don't trust any written story or transcript that can be edited in order to make this preposterous proposition seem more logical. Listen for yourself.
1 posted on 03/26/2013 9:01:04 AM PDT by binreadin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: binreadin

What a bunch of BS. Crank up the draft.


2 posted on 03/26/2013 9:07:17 AM PDT by mosaicwolf (Strength and Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: binreadin

I didn’t hear this interview, because I try to avoid National Propaganda Radio whenever possible. However, if he really said that, then what a bunch of B.S. The question of women in combat is a completely different question from women in the combat arms (infantry, etc.). Also, the military is not having any problems meeting its recruiting goals thanks to the ObamaNonEconomy. Plus, Dempsey’s boss is working hard to downsize the military - especially the army and marines.


3 posted on 03/26/2013 9:07:53 AM PDT by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConjunctionJunction

dempsey is a butt kissing ass.


4 posted on 03/26/2013 9:10:01 AM PDT by bravo whiskey (We should not fear our government. Our government shoud fear us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: binreadin

Complete nonsense.

If this were true, the Army could just convert some of the males from service support branches to combat branches.

Once we have nothing but females in all the service branches, I’ll start to believe him.


5 posted on 03/26/2013 9:12:22 AM PDT by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bravo whiskey

Yes, he is. Just go along with the PC program.


6 posted on 03/26/2013 9:12:36 AM PDT by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: binreadin

In 1940 the population of the US was a little over 130 million.

At the peak, we had over 12 million people in uniform - nearly 10% of the population of the entire country.

We never had to put women into combat.

Now we’re trying to maintain a military establishment less than 1% of the country - less than one-tenth of the max effort of the 1940s.

And we have to put women into combat?

Utterly preposterous.


7 posted on 03/26/2013 9:12:40 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: binreadin
As Qualified Men Dwindle, Military Looks For A Few Good Women

-snip-

'DEMPSEY: I think it's fairly common knowledge that our population of military-age young men who qualify for the military is declining.

BOWMAN: That's because too many have brushes with the law. They drop out of high school, have drug problems, and add to that a rising obesity rate. So General Dempsey and the Joint Chiefs looked out to the end of the decade, 2020, and decided they had to recruit more women.

DEMPSEY: And so, as a very practical matter, we decided if in 2020 we're going to need these young ladies and we're going to need to attract as much diversity and as much talent as we can possibly attract, if that's going to be the case, what are we waiting for?

BOWMAN: A very practical matter, because less than one in four young people - male and female - can actually meet the standards for military enlistment today. Men tend to disqualify themselves more than women. Young men account for three-quarters of all arrests. And in all 50 states, males have a higher high school drop out rate than females.'

8 posted on 03/26/2013 9:13:17 AM PDT by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: binreadin
The REAL purpose was to emasculate the military. 0bama doesn't want any REAL men in the military because they are more likely to resist our traitorous government and less likely to fire upon American citizens.

Females, lesbians, emasculated and gay males are being placed into all positions of authority. This is how you suppress internal revolt against the government.

9 posted on 03/26/2013 9:19:35 AM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (PRISON AT BENGHAZI?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

A lot of Judges sent kids who had little brushes with the law into the Marines to straighten them out.

Worked like a charm.

Of course, that was before the rise of gangs


10 posted on 03/26/2013 9:21:58 AM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: binreadin

I call total BS. There are still plenty of administrative and support roles being performed by male service members who could be changed to combat MOSs if they really wanted to. Dempsey is a kissass.


11 posted on 03/26/2013 9:28:37 AM PDT by clintonh8r (Happy to be represented by Lt. Col. Allen West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

They declared War Against Boys and now they've put Girls on the front lines.

Predictable, really.

12 posted on 03/26/2013 9:42:02 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The ballot box is a sham. Nothing will change until after the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: binreadin
"He said that they had to bring women into combat, as only one in four young males in our nation were eligible for enlistment due to the national dropout rate and the increased number of legal problems experienced in the young male demographic."

I think he's referring to a recent study by the "Mission: Readiness" group but neglected to point out that one "big" reason is that they are too fat (27%), and "Nearly 32 percent have other disqualifying health problems, including asthma, eyesight or hearing problems, mental health issues, or recent treatment for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder." That's 27% + 32% + 25% (eligible)= 84%. That leaves 16% who are dropouts/have arrest records. Which is probably the same 16% "problem children" for all the other problems with youth today.

If there is a problem with the US military recruiting eligible males, it probably has more to do with the Obama administration's obvious disdain for the military.


13 posted on 03/26/2013 9:52:05 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: binreadin

Hey General!

How about fixing your screwed up Rules of Engagement and Social Services Mission Creep?!?!?

Then you’d discover you have plenty of talent to do the job!


14 posted on 03/26/2013 10:20:33 AM PDT by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: binreadin

All females between the ages of 18-60 should be required to register with the Selective Service. Why should males be singled out for this? Fair is fair and we are going to keep getting this nonsense until ALL females have some skin in the game. Now, 98% of the females yawn about women in the Infantry because they don’t have to worry about it. Make them worry about it, and this talk about females in the Infantry will go away.


15 posted on 03/26/2013 10:20:58 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

Together with abortion, same sex marriage, anti-gun laws and now women in combat — it’s all part of the culture of death.

You ask what anti-gun laws have to do with the C of D? Take away all guns from law-abiding citizens and watch the killing rate skyrocket.


16 posted on 03/26/2013 10:41:31 AM PDT by 353FMG ( I do not indicate whether I am serious or sarcastic -- I respect FReepers too much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mosaicwolf

And let’s draft women while we’re at it. Hold them to the same standards as men, make them hump heavy rucks for umpteen miles, assign women to carry the mortar base plates in weapons companies, the whole deal.

Might as well get this silliness over and done with as quickly as possible.

As soon as “womyn” get a taste of real physical exertion, they’ll STFU and dispense with this idiotic blather.

Give them what they want, good and hard.

Oh, and if they try to get pregnant to get out of serving their term? Give them a choice: less-than-honorable discharge or get an abortion. The lefties love abortion, so again, give the womyn what they claim they want - good and hard.


17 posted on 03/26/2013 11:31:44 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mosaicwolf

You are right, it’s b.s.

He has been caught lying and performing political war drama for Obama’s agenda before, too. He was in on the you-tube video lies during the embassy fiasco in Bengazi. He’s also called for Shiara speech controls on the United States. He’s the tool who called and harassed the minister Jones who burned the Koran in protest of Queen Bloomer’s victory mosque at ground zero. He should be removed from power.


18 posted on 03/26/2013 1:30:26 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn

This is all lying drama to serve the Left’s agenda.


19 posted on 03/26/2013 1:31:44 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson