To: SeekAndFind
2 posted on
03/25/2013 7:08:25 AM PDT by
Doofer
(Still, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.)
To: SeekAndFind
Why is stop and frisk a good thing?
3 posted on
03/25/2013 7:08:32 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: SeekAndFind
I would not tolerate stop and frisk. Its unconstitutional.
I don’t care about how effective it is, its unconstitutional.
Stop and frisk appears to be a natural requirement, once you’ve disarmed the citizenry. The police can’t protect anyone if they only react; thus, scared defenseless citizens are OK with abusing the rights of people who might be criminals with preemptive searches.
4 posted on
03/25/2013 7:09:26 AM PDT by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: SeekAndFind
Did you expect a fair, objective, balanced, informative, non biased article in the New York Times?
8 posted on
03/25/2013 7:14:26 AM PDT by
allendale
To: SeekAndFind
It works, but it is unconstitutional.
25 posted on
03/25/2013 7:37:42 AM PDT by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: SeekAndFind
Black people have the RIGHT to commit any crime they want. Didn’t you get the memo?
To: SeekAndFind
Leave it to Heather MacDonald to lick the boots of the Staten Island Cowboys. Sorry, Vinny and Paddy Donut muncher, there is something called a Constitution which your ancestors did nothing to write, but which protects us all.
The judge made the right decision, albeit for the wrong reasons.
97 posted on
08/12/2013 7:20:04 PM PDT by
Clemenza
("History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil governm)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson