Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/24/2013 5:52:47 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Since Reagan, Clinton and Obama have been good at countering the advance made by Reagan, regarding how
Americans view and understand our system.

It takes more than a Reagan every few decades, to remind people how it is supposed to work.

The dems hammer away continually, and few conservatives speak with Reagan’s skill.


2 posted on 03/24/2013 6:06:06 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The difference between classical and modern liberalism revolves around the idea of positive and negative liberty. Negative liberty describes what the founding fathers believed in: limited government. Modern liberalism embraces the idea of positive liberty, however: the idea that liberty is provided to you through government benefits. Therefore, the more power the government has, the more freedom individuals have. It’s ludicrous, but that’s the driving philosophy behind modern liberalism.


3 posted on 03/24/2013 6:13:24 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

No argument about substance. But when people go looking for “soul” classical liberalism isn’t where they go.


8 posted on 03/25/2013 2:33:20 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson