Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: skeeter

When the US Supreme Court ruled the act of sodomy was no longer illegal the next logical step for the sodomites is to say they are being discriminated against because they can’t get “married”. A blind man could have saw this coming. When the government legalizes the perverted, demented, unnatural act of sodomy - and all the deadly diseases that come with it, there is no turning back. Sodom and Gomorrah redux. My prediction is John Roberts will be the deciding vote and say DOMA is unconstitutional, and throwing his Catholic faith right out the window, he will defy 5,000 years of recorded history and say that marriage is nothing more than a contract (a legal piece of paper), and anyone can enter into this contract. I will then go down to the courthouse and demand that I be allowed to marry both my St Bernard dogs so I can claim them as exemptions on my income tax, and depending on how I’m feeling, I might also fill out a marriage application on 50 or so of my chickens. My neighbor Joe wants to marry his two goats.


40 posted on 03/24/2013 8:42:19 AM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: NKP_Vet
Its just as clear that criminalization of expressions of disapproval of gay behavior is next. From the pulpit and wherever else.

Take that to the bank.

42 posted on 03/24/2013 9:29:54 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet
My prediction is John Roberts will be the deciding vote and say DOMA is unconstitutional, and throwing his Catholic faith right out the window, he will defy 5,000 years of recorded history and say that marriage is nothing more than a contract (a legal piece of paper), and anyone can enter into this contract.

Oh come on, let's putt it in character: hell say that money to obtain a marriage license is not a fee, but a tax, and therefore falls under the preview of Congress... but rule that DOMA is unconstitutional because it is... erm... uh... Ex Post Facto, yeah that's the ticket, Ex Post Facto. Because it, um, causes the federal government to not recognize marriages that were recognized by the State... and, um, violates the 9th amendment.,, and because it's Ex Post Facto BOTH States and the Federal government are prohibited from passing laws on it... thus he will declare that even in the states which don't recognize it have to because... um, you have to do what the Supreme Court says! Roe v. Wade, the states and their laws are our playthings! *insert maniacal laughter*

{The above is an attempt at humor, to show how utterly disconnected from sound legal reasoning our judicial system has become.}

45 posted on 03/24/2013 5:19:42 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson