Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Santorum and Gingrich discussed unity ticket in 2012 primary
The Washington Examiner ^ | March 22, 2013

Posted on 03/22/2013 7:34:44 AM PDT by US Navy Vet

Joshua Green shares an amazing story about the secret negotiations between Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich for a “unity ticket” during the Republican Presidential primary. In the end, Green reports, neither of the two Republican leaders could agree which of the two would be president.

(T)he two candidates spoke face-to-face at an energy forum just before the primary. Gingrich made an elaborate historical argument that when the party hasn’t been able to agree on a nominee, it always settles on the senior figure. Santorum wasn’t persuaded, and urged Gingrich to do what was best for the conservative movement.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gingrich; gope; hubris; newt; newtgingrich; ricksantorum; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
Yep NO doubt about we had a "Real" "Good" "Slate" of "candidates" last year. A$$HOLES ALL!
1 posted on 03/22/2013 7:34:44 AM PDT by US Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

I don’t like Gingrich but the things I don’t like about him are exactly why I thought he would be an ideal VP choice for Santorum.

They certainly would have rolled over Romney like he wasn’t even there.


2 posted on 03/22/2013 7:37:35 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

3 posted on 03/22/2013 7:38:43 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
Santorum wasn’t persuaded, and urged Gingrich to do what was best for the conservative movement.

Looked up hubris online and saw Santorum's picture...

4 posted on 03/22/2013 7:38:56 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Hope and Change has become Attack and Obfuscate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Agree with you.


5 posted on 03/22/2013 7:40:35 AM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to thoe tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
In the end, Green reports, neither of the two Republican leaders could agree which of the two would be president.

 

Did they try Rock, Paper, Scissors?

Flip a Coin?

Eenie Meenie Minie Mo?

 

6 posted on 03/22/2013 7:41:17 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
Looked up hubris online and saw Santorum's picture...

Man, that hurts.

7 posted on 03/22/2013 7:43:38 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

I like 2 .38s with one round each, lock ‘em BOTH in a room and whichever one of them comes out is the winner.


8 posted on 03/22/2013 7:43:40 AM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
neither of the two Republican leaders could agree which of the two would be president.

That is because neither ever will be.

==

The last thing/people we need in 2016 is a bunch of retreads from the 2012 primaries.

So far, now we have Perry, Santorum and Gingrich hinting. Those along with Christie, JBush, Rubio, Paul, Ryan, Huckabee and Carson already make for a crowded stage. And not a one of them is such a stellar candidate who could win against a strong Democrat.


9 posted on 03/22/2013 7:46:46 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
Looked up hubris online and saw Santorum's picture...

They're already starting to push the next hand picked loser republican for the 2016 race.


10 posted on 03/22/2013 7:50:07 AM PDT by Iron Munro (I miss America, don't you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
In the end, Green reports, neither of the two Republican leaders could agree which of the two would be president.

Narcissistic D-bags much?

11 posted on 03/22/2013 7:51:35 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Gingrich made an elaborate historical argument that when the party hasn’t been able to agree on a nominee, it always settles on the senior figure.

*************

Newt knew that essentially this was his last chance for Number One and taking the 2nd spot would have ended that chance. Rick on the other hand could have taken the 2nd spot and still have had a chance for the top spot later.


12 posted on 03/22/2013 7:53:41 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

Just like Soros, et al, decided to buy up BOTH parties instead of gambling on one, the aspirants themselves are being bought and groomed

That’s the reason for the maniacal demand for widespread same-day primaries; to eliminate candidates who aren’t already approved by big-money guys.


13 posted on 03/22/2013 7:54:02 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

Go back and compare who was actually winning GOP primaries (or losing to Romney’s money by just a few points) when Gingrich refused to deal

I think that was Newts pho-to you saw


14 posted on 03/22/2013 7:54:19 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age Takes a Toll: Please Have Exact Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

I’d suggest a cage match. But we all know who would win there.

(Although Newt must be in his 60’s now. And is getting pudgy and soft.)


15 posted on 03/22/2013 7:55:50 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

I can’t see Newt playing second fiddle to anyone.


16 posted on 03/22/2013 7:56:04 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Newt/Sweater Vest ping.


17 posted on 03/22/2013 8:00:50 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Read the article. This conversation took place before the primary. Ricky Sanctimonious is a big government socon in addition to a backstabbing weasel. I wish he would slither back to Pa or wherever he calls home and be a family man.
18 posted on 03/22/2013 8:07:17 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Hope and Change has become Attack and Obfuscate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
The last thing/people we need in 2016 is a bunch of retreads from the 2012 primaries.

I agree. I said the same after 2008 and look what we got. Romney and another loss.

We need someone new and fresh. Also, too many throw their hats in the ring and split the conservative vote. Limit the number and/or hold a "conservative", invite only run-off before the GOPe run primary. All conservatives who 'apply' would be required to drop out in favor of the winner.

Jim DeMint at the Heritage Foundation could be the organizer. Come to think of it, Heritage should set up an annual conference right now to supplant CPAC next year.

19 posted on 03/22/2013 8:07:39 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Calling Dr. Benjamin Carson...Please Report to the GOP Primary Stat!


20 posted on 03/22/2013 8:13:44 AM PDT by Artcore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson