Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
You've provided some of the analysis of the fundamentals I was looking for, to confirm the technical market analysis in the article. The technical analysis in the article does indicate a bearish market opinion about copper -- but, what do the fundamentals say?

I used to live in a copper-mining district & made the same point as you, about the switch from copper to fiber optic cable -- but, never considered that the market could be controlled. Can you point us to some solid evidence of the hoarding that would be necessary to control market prices that way. I know that the (jewel-quality) diamond market is controlled -- but, that gambit hasn't worked out very well in other commodities markets. (Recall the Hunt Bros. and silver?)

Another factor to consider is the switch from wired to wireless telephony. That may not have nearly as large an effect on copper demand in the developed world, as the switch to fiber optic cable; but, it seems to be effectively eliminating most opportunities to grow the market in the third world. Under-developed countries are installing wireless networks, and completely leapfrogging wired communications technology.

On the other hand; electric vehicles could boost demand for copper (when and if they ever become economically viable). Similarly, demand for electric generators of all types is set to continue growing.

Another source of demand for copper was created at about the time that fiber optic cables weakened demand for communications -- home wiring. For a time, it looked like aluminum was a viable substitute for copper wiring. Then, it became obvious that aluminum wiring was hazardous, and most people went back to using copper wiring.

The same could be said for many other uses of copper. There will always be substitution at the margin (as in any market). If the price of copper goes down, the demand will go up, and vice versa, because of the substitution effects.


20 posted on 03/19/2013 1:05:05 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

There is a big difference between copper producers controlling the market, and De Beers monopolistic control, and the Hunt brothers trying to corner silver.

To start with copper at the production level, even small prices in copper will open or close mines, a very expensive proposition. And the ore is so low grade that when the price of copper drops, at times the gold mined as a by product is actually worth more than the copper.

So the producers very much want price stability. Second, because copper is fairly low value, their biggest concerns are purposes and companies that consume a lot. Another good reason for stability being provision contracts. Large amounts of copper sold at fixed prices.


21 posted on 03/19/2013 4:02:16 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson