Anti-Jihadist dittos to Pamela Geller!!
Anti-Jihadist dittos to Pamela Geller!!
Totally ironic, Pamela that your topic was “The War on Free Speech” and then you turn around and were one of the ones to shut Orly Taitz down when she tried to bring up 0bama’s documentation - or lack thereof.
To paraphrase a few lines from Pam’s comments:
The left and “many conservatives” are attempting to intimidate the ‘birthers’ or “constitutionalists” into criminalizing criticism of 0bama’s documentation. What is shameful is the eagerness of the Western mainstream media, the left and even many conservatives to do their bidding by censoring themselves by not speaking about 0bama’s forged documents, and demonizing and marginalizing those who dare to speak the truth about the forged, missing and doctored documents. By their silence and weak response to the attacks, defamation and libel of voices of freedom, the right has sanctioned this speech-crushing device of the after-birthers. Silence is sanction.
Cuts both ways, Pam. While I applaud your efforts to expose the demon that is islam, don’t become what you bemoan in the process.
Why is this?.
Suhail Khan, moderator of a small CPAC panel was asked about his previous year’s statement at CPAC, “There is no Muslim Brotherhood in America.” It was pointed out to Khan, the Muslim Brotherhood via CAIR had said, “Yes, we are here in America”, along with four federal U.S. judges who also declared the same. When asked if he desired to retract his statement; the questioner was asked to leave the conference room and was ridiculed by Khan and his followers.
Was not this a legitimate question? Why was it not answered?
What is the purpose of CPAC? If Khan’s denial of the Muslim Brotherhood, in America, position is acceptable, then an individual’s principles are no bar to CPAC membership. If an individual’s principles are not important, then CPAC is a fraud!
Would Ronald Reagan approve of CPAC’s direction?