Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Arizona doesn't have voter fraud problems. "They turn a blind eye," Pearce said of the state's election officials.Maricopa County, where nearly 60 percent of Arizona's voters live, said voter fraud is rare, and even rarer among illegal immigrants.

"That just does not seem to be an issue," Osborne said of the claim that illegal immigrants are voting. "They did not want to come out of the shadows. They don't want to be involved with the government."

What shadows is Osborne talking about ? Illegals across America are stepping out to tell the American public of their position,this being we are undocumented and unafraid.They've has those bus tours with banners attach to side of the bus...Undocumented and unafraid..Illegals not voting..How many here believe this is very rare an illegals would never vote ? This is why Illegals use document fraud to do things they cannot legally, but can do so thanks to the use of fake or stolen documents.

1 posted on 03/18/2013 8:45:57 AM PDT by moonshinner_09
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: moonshinner_09
The Supreme Court will consider the validity of an Arizona law that tries to keep illegal immigrants from voting

Seriously? We are we even DISCUSSING this?

And people want to know whats wrong with America?

2 posted on 03/18/2013 8:48:53 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: moonshinner_09

The court will do what it always has, lately, and find the federal law somehow preempts the field and the state laws in conflict with it will be stricken. They have the idea that a Federal anything, overrides a State anything.

Of course, there is no real conflict, because all citizens would be allowed to vote under either the Federal or State law.

One merely offers to prove it. The other thinks it is OK to take one two-letter word for it when asked if they are US Citizens, “Si.”


3 posted on 03/18/2013 8:52:14 AM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: moonshinner_09

Arizona should reference this flaw in the DOJ argument: Under the low-income, Lifeline discounted phone service program, the FCC authorized applicants to self-certify their eligibility for the program under penalty of perjury. No longer! In the Lifeline Reform order released February, 2012, the FCC, citing fraud and abuse in self-certification, now requires all applicants to provide documented proof of eligibility. So there is a need to document eligibility in order to get discounted phone service but, heck, it’s not necessary to do so in order to safeguard the integrity of our electoral system?


7 posted on 03/18/2013 9:21:01 AM PDT by BamaCharm (Creation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson