In the first case, you entered into a contract voluntarily. In the second case, your rights were violated. Presumably, the offender would be given due process before being deprived of life liberty or property. More than likely, s/he would voluntarily take care of the problem so it doesn’t come to that.
“In the first case, you entered into a contract voluntarily.”
I’ll take that as a “Yes, I have the right due to the contract to require property or labor from them according to the terms of the contract”.
But I think that, at least in part, negates the statement “Well, a right can’t require anything from anyone else other than they not infringe upon yours. Nothing anyone claims as a right can require property or labor from another”.
I have to step out for awhile. Maybe I’ll address the rest of the post later. Maybe.