Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tennessee Nana

Well, voter ID has been upheld by the Supreme Court. One must be a citizen to legally vote. It seems like a logical extension of documenting identity and eligibility to vote.

But to liberals, I know that none of this makes any sense. To liberals, we can’t have any restrictions or documentation because some old lady somewhere, never ever got a driver’s license or government issued ID. Because there are some rare cases such as this, liberals take the position that we can’t ask anyone for any documentation of eligibility.


32 posted on 03/17/2013 2:28:19 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego
Well, voter ID has been upheld by the Supreme Court. One must be a citizen to legally vote. It seems like a logical extension of documenting identity and eligibility to vote.

The only reason this issue is before SCOTUS is that Congress passed the Motor Voter Act in 1994, which permitted people to register to vote without showing proof of citizenship. The issue is whether that Congressional statute trumps the state law.

61 posted on 03/18/2013 3:22:52 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson