Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: null and void

Not for a good long while yet.

Their delivery systems are still not very reliable.

Their suspected nuclear devices are still too large to be able to fit on the tip of a missile.

Their technology is still not sophisticated enough to detonate any EMP device over Kansas.

If they continue to develop their technology, these things will be possible, but not for at least a decade, IMO.


6 posted on 03/16/2013 9:53:31 AM PDT by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Pox

Please see History-WWII-Pearl Harbor. It is coming.


14 posted on 03/16/2013 10:02:04 AM PDT by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Pox
Not for a good long while yet.

Perhaps.

Their delivery systems are still not very reliable.

Not yet. But even with a 1/3 reliability 3 launches = one successful orbital insertion.

Their suspected nuclear devices are still too large to be able to fit on the tip of a missile.

As far as we "know". We don't actually "know" that much about them. Are the low yield explosions indications of failed city buster nuclear bombs or successful tests of enhanced yield (neutron or EMP trigger) bombs?

Their technology is still not sophisticated enough to detonate any EMP device over Kansas.

They have the puzzle pieces.

If they continue to develop their technology, these things will be possible, but not for at least a decade, IMO.

Within a factor of two to how far way from any bomb the CIA said they were when they actually set one off.

21 posted on 03/16/2013 11:49:28 AM PDT by null and void (Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Don't enable tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson