[TurboZamboni]

nothing to see here in Frankenland...la la la la...I'm not listening!

[Chode]

and the RATS, take another one in the.........HA ha!!!

[Ann Archy]

Democrats CHEAT....it’s WHAT they DO!!! Vote Fraud is in their BLOOD!

[4integrity]

WHAT...??!! Voter fraud? Can’t be...there’s no voter fraud....all the Democrats tell us so. DUH!! Had the Republican Party and the Romney team had the courage to challenge all of the questionable election results, perhaps, our country would be in a better place!

[Steely Tom]

Here are the MSM rules for covering political scandals where the correlation between the party affiliations of the affected politicians is a little too obvious to ignore.

1. If the politicians are all Democrats, don't even mention their political affialiation at all, because we wouldn't want to look like we're piling on or taking sides. This line of thought is amplified by the fact that if the unfortunate pols happen to belong to a partcular minority racial category they will undoubtedly be Democrats, and then it's a twofer for the "no piling on" issue.
2. If the politicians are all Republicans, promote the stuffing out of their party affiliation, starting with the headline and continuing throught pretty much every sentence (or at least paragraph) in the entire story. Oddly enough, the rationale for this is the same as that used in in the Democrat case - see (1) - above.

Since - as a practical matter - Democrat scandals outnumber Republican scandals by about eight to one, the net effect of these rules is that the party affiliation of scandalized politicians is effectively not mentioned.