Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

How long until farmers and farming is nationalized?
1 posted on 03/13/2013 8:42:36 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


2 posted on 03/13/2013 8:43:12 AM PDT by Nachum (The Obama "List" at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

The strategic question is this: Who is going to raise, be responsible for and instill fundamental values in future generations of Americans? Will it be parents or the state?

Obviously it will be the State, just like When Chris Rock looks at Obama as his Daddy, for all he knows, he just might be. And dare I say that most Blacks look to Government as being their Daddy. We are so screwed


3 posted on 03/13/2013 8:49:32 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

My daughter teaches English at a high school for students who have gotten into trouble. When her class discovered that she did not receive food stamps, they were astonished, and could not understand how she obtained food.

But what do you expect when 41% of all children are born out of wedlock?


4 posted on 03/13/2013 8:49:35 AM PDT by LucianOfSamasota (Tanstaafl - its not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Farmers love this and other Federal Government food programs. There is no group of people who are more socialist than them.


5 posted on 03/13/2013 8:51:30 AM PDT by Tea Party Terrorist (Those who work for a living are now outnumbered by those who vote for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
There was a news story broadcast not too long ago in my hometown of La Crosse, Wis. where some local educrats seriously wondered to the cameras how the schoolkids were going to eat if federal lunch programs were cut. I wanted to throw a brick through my tv screen as I shrieked "how about their parents provide a lunch for them?"

All to no avail. Now they want summer lunch programs. Oh my, the poor kids will starve to death if the government doesn't give them a "free" lunch. My wife has to tell me to calm down and watch my blood pressure when I see these things on tv.

6 posted on 03/13/2013 8:51:48 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Honestly, I was shocked to read that in 1969 40% of school kids were on the School Lunch program.


7 posted on 03/13/2013 8:53:00 AM PDT by Jane Long
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Sixty-four Percent of Schoolchildren Fed on Federal Subsidies,

Why are the schools giving breakfast, lunch and dinner to schoolkids while the 'sperm and egg doners' get food stamps.

I thought Food Stamps are to feed the kids!!

8 posted on 03/13/2013 9:06:29 AM PDT by ExCTCitizen (More Republicans stayed home then the margin of victory of O's Win...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Big Food lobby.


12 posted on 03/13/2013 9:13:26 AM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Farming is nationalized.

See Farm Subsidies.


13 posted on 03/13/2013 9:16:03 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Due Process 2013: "Burn the M*****-F***er Down!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Not soon, I hope, ‘cause we’ll all starve.


16 posted on 03/13/2013 9:20:55 AM PDT by Little Ray (Waiting for the return of the Gods of the Copybook Headings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

So that fact that I pack a lunch for my kids every school morning makes me some sort of nutty anachronism?

Oh, well. In the world, but not of it.


17 posted on 03/13/2013 9:27:03 AM PDT by Little Ray (Waiting for the return of the Gods of the Copybook Headings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum; All
Congress has no authority under the Constitution's Section 8 of Article I to lay taxes to fund the meals of schoolchildren. In fact, Justice John Marshall had officially clarified Congress's Section 8-limited power to lay taxes.
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." --Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

Parents / guardians of schoolchildren have less money in their personal bank accounts to give their kids lunch money because Congress has taxes taken out of parents' payroll checks which Congress cannot justify under Section 8.

Note that the Founding States had established the federal Senate to kill appropriations bills originating in the House of Representatives which establish taxes that ignore Section 8. But as a consequence of state lawmakers unthinkingly giving up control of the federal Senate by ratifying the 17th Amendment, federal senators now help to pass appropriations bills which rob the citizens who elected them to office by means of constitutionally indefensible taxes.

In other words, instead of getting their hands dirty by robbing banks for a living, elite crooks in the USA rob people by getting themselves elected as federal lawmakers to fill their pockets by legislating illegal federal taxes.

19 posted on 03/13/2013 10:05:04 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

The sum of the collection of the effects of the Liberal media and the Liberal cradle-to-grave federal-handout state says to a young woman:

“Why get married; the state will feed my kid brealfast and lunch at a free school through highschool, pay for his college and then give him a government job as a soon-to-be tenured teacher so he can raise the next crop of kids for the state.??”


20 posted on 03/13/2013 10:14:26 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Our son, now 19, was in Jr. High some 6 years ago. We wanted him to take more advanced classes and he was turned down based on testing and other criteria. As soon as the school found out he was on the free lunch program, the story changed. Yes, he could take the advanced classes. How many families are being forced to put their kids on fed lunch subsidies in order to get the better classes for them?

In the end our son was the High School Valedictorian for the class of 2012. He went to a 4-year college having already 70 college credit hours under his belt.

He would not have been able to get there if he wasn’t on the fed lunch program in 2007.


24 posted on 03/13/2013 10:56:12 AM PDT by George from New England (escaped CT in 2006, now living north of Tampa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

This article is misleading. I ate at school cafeterias in the 1960’s and early 70’s, but paid full price. The subsidy comes in if a kid qualifies for free or reduced lunch. So, the author is greatly inflating his numbers.


25 posted on 03/13/2013 11:00:51 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Anoter government do good program. Once started only multiples and grows more expensive. There was no free lunches when I went to school.


26 posted on 03/13/2013 11:08:05 AM PDT by geotroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson