Posted on 03/10/2013 7:10:37 AM PDT by Kaslin
Actually, liberals say the enemy should get treated like common criminal all the time.
If it were up to me John Walker Lindh would have died in the Afghan hell hole of his own choosing as should any “former” American fighting for the enemy.
However, America is a land of enemies in the eyes of the democrats and only a fool would allow them to kill at will.
And now we are down the rabbit hole. The libs define “enemy” as us. They define “combat” as doing anything that opposes them.
Paranoid? Not at all. The libs have a long history of redefining anything to mean what they want it to mean in order to get whatever it is they want at that time.
“Is” - Clinton
“Marriage” - Gay rights advocates
“Enemy” - 0bama/Holder
“Combat” - 0bama/Holder
“Choice” - abortion right activists
“community organizer” - rabble rousers and their followers
I’m sure you can think of other words to add to the list.
Good points. You should now beware of tiny objects circling overhead...
I have a Hutaree “militia” member living nearby. I could be collateral damage.
At which point the administration could find that we’ve said “Hi” to each other and even been in the same room and I could be posthumously convicted for plotting against the government.
You’re a FReeper. Your neighbor will be the collateral damage.
They’ll have to carpet bomb the whole town with all the enemies of the left that are here.
Wow...just posted something very similar in line of thought on the other thread.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2995352/posts?page=37#37
But we are. nobama is taking more and more power and NOBODY, least of all the lazy ass slimy RINOS in the House, is even lifting a finger in protest. Disgusting!!
Obama has become the classic unsupervised bully with a new BB gun. Unfortunately his BB gun fires hellfire missiles.
Which we have done during bombing raids, from Germany and Japan in World War II to Iraq and Afghanistan in the recent conflict. Would Paul Jacobs condemn the U.S. for that as well?
Have we declared war on Yemen?
Only an idiot could compare Germany and Japan to the random killings the Obama misadministration is conducting.
Killing a terrorist and his associates is one thing. Killing a terrorist and everyone who happens to be nearby is a whole different ball game. Obama is doing little more than aiding the most radical to power.
In November of 1986 I had an assistant DA in Corpus Christi, TX threaten my life.
She made it clear she could have the police kill me any time she wanted and she would see to it that it was done legally.
Did they ever try?
Yes they did.
Would have done it too except the idiots tried to make it look like an accident.
Cop totaled a brand new police cruiser in the process.
Anyone that would even contemplate giving the govt this authority is past insane.
In the eyes of many dems, if the govt can get this authority while a dem is in power, the dems will never be out of power.
Suddenly all opposition to the dems will be involved in “accidents”.
House blows up because of gas leak. A wire in the cars fuel tank ignited the tank. Blew themselves up while making a bomb.
I’ve got a Hutaree “militia” member living less than a half mile away. Killing him in a drone strike would have been a whole let less embarrassing for the administration than all those acquittals that resulted from the high profile raid.
After all, they were supposedly plotting against government. (it was actually an informant inspired bull session that was tame compared to some of what we see openly posted here at FR)
I’ve been picking up on little bits and pieces in the news that make me believe another high profile “Waco/military” style raid is being planned by fed agents against some group somewhere.
One thing I’ve noticed was the ACLU raising questions about the use of military weapons by law enforcement.
It may be nothing but I don’t trust the ACLU as far as I can throw them.
It’s struck me as being what the left calls “heightened public awareness”.
Make the public aware of the issue before the event takes place in order to maximize the outrage.
It always amazes me, when people like McCain state that the thought that the U.S. might target it’s own citizens, is “ridiculous”. That shows a complete disregard for the history of mankind. History is replete with examples of governments turning on their own citizens. No need to mention them here.
It CAN happen here. Hence, the second amendment.
Don’t you think it hypocritical that the liberal’s were apocalyptic when the soldiers put underwear on the prisoners heads at Abu Ghraib and exclaimed for months that was causing terrorist attacks, but killing people from 30,000 feet or whatever feet they fly, is fine? and didn’t they bitch right up to their messiah being elected about Guantanamo, and how that was causing terrorist attacks, then they bring OBL son in law to NY city to try him in a US court by a jury of his “peers?” I am sure his case will be thrown out as for sure when he was captured he was not read his Miranda rights.
Where are the people with a working brain, asking these questions?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.