Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alas Babylon!

Thanks for the thread, AB! No Rand Paul? That doesn’t make any sense.

Did everybody spring ahead?


16 posted on 03/10/2013 5:56:48 AM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Girlene
No Rand Paul? That doesn’t make any sense.

And the all Jeb all the time push is coming early. They're so utterly transparent. If Rand comes up at all on today's shows it will be in the form of some snarky bigfoot remarks by the libs AND the RINOs and they'll quickly move on.

I hate there people. We need a Conservative network.

18 posted on 03/10/2013 6:01:25 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Girlene

Since husband has so much practice with clocks last week, this week was a breeze.

;)

For the record, before I head off, I think McCain and Graham are history.

They look small and churlish.

As for Jeb Bush....anybody gonna vote for him stay away from me.

I mean it was Eric Holder. This guy is a real jerk and for sale to everyone with a buck. Paul asks him out if the gubmint can target American civilians without benefit of a trial if in America and any kind of attack is not imminent.

WHY COULDN’T HOLDER HAVE SAID A SIMPLE NO????

Why???

Why doesn’t someone ask McLame and Grahamnesty this?

If Holder had simply responded like most normal political types would have...ie:

“Of course the President would not target an American on American soil without benefit of due process...but of course not!”

Just providing the simple sentence Eric could have returned.

And like I always say....you know I do....give me credit...
THE RINOS WILL REACH ACROSS THE AISLE TO THE DEMOCRATS BUT WILL RIP OFF THE HEAD OF ANYONE DARING TO THREATEN THEIR POWER AND CRAP DOWN THE BLOODY STUMP!

As McCain and Graham illustrated so aptly with their childish attack on a fellow Republican.

They could have....said...NOTHING?

They could have written an editorial for the WSJ.

They surely have a right to disagree with Rand Paul but they look so small, so elite,.....they really look bad, folks.

Which makes me happy.


20 posted on 03/10/2013 6:06:17 AM PDT by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson