I’m descended from Robert Fitzwalter, the leader of the Magna Carta Barons, so I’ve studied many of the the things of which you speak.
And my assertion is that the condoning of homosexual conduct is one of the worst violations of the premises of the English Constitution imaginable, because it destroys its moral basis and authority.
Well, that argument would not have any relevance in a court of law, so your assertion really has nothing to do with the reality here.
Morality is not a constitutional issue - perhaps that’s unfortunate, but it’s a fact. And the Monarch is certainly not free to impose their own personal morality on the law - which when you look at the behaviours of some of the Monarchs is a very good thing.
All Monarchs since about the time of William and Mary have upheld the constitution - not all have been moral people.