Masthead Editorial means it was written by two or more members of their Editorial Board with the approval of the management.
1 posted on
03/07/2013 11:07:54 PM PST by
neverdem
To: neverdem
It seems some leftys realize the tax dollars they can squeeze out of this project.
2 posted on
03/07/2013 11:09:50 PM PST by
Amberdawn
To: neverdem
Progressives want us to rely on ME energy. Their policy keeps the US mired in unending wars.
3 posted on
03/07/2013 11:25:03 PM PST by
NoLibZone
(We have the nation we deserve.I predict FR will hate GOP Candidate for 2016,2020,2024,2028, 2032...)
To: neverdem
Well, we at least know what Obama wants thanks to the ComPost editorial (the ComPost might as well be merged with the DNC): he wants to allow the pipeline and impose a carbon tax.
To: neverdem
The unions won’t stand for the pipeline to be stopped.
And they’re about 1000 times more important to Democrats than the environmental watermelons
5 posted on
03/08/2013 12:48:32 AM PST by
Mount Athos
(A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
To: neverdem
The real stupidity of the whole environMENTALists and the AGW crowd, is that you would want everything done where it is done most efficiently, in an economy which could afford to take the precautions and utilize the safeguards which protect the environment.
Frankly, that means right here, where we already have some of the most restrictive measures on the planet.
Guaranteeing that things are done elsewhere without regard for the messes made is contrary to their supposed mission of protecting the planet.
(Which is actually, I know, the destruction of Western Industry, not protecting the planet.)
6 posted on
03/08/2013 12:57:11 AM PST by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
To: neverdem
The White House has calculated that it is no longer politically prudent to block the Keystone project. Obama will soon announce his decision. The talking points were given to the Post and the Times so they could begin changing the liberal groupthink on the project.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2994705/posts
8 posted on
03/08/2013 2:03:23 AM PST by
Brad from Tennessee
(A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
To: neverdem
The election is over. He doesn’t need the Greenies anymore and has to pay off the union for their support.
10 posted on
03/08/2013 4:37:29 AM PST by
kevkrom
(If a wise man has an argument with a foolish man, the fool only rages or laughs...)
To: neverdem
PRESIDENT OBAMA began his second term with a promise to push harder on energy and climate change.Well, the push on "climate change" isn't working, in less than 2 weeks winter will turn to spring. /s
11 posted on
03/08/2013 5:05:22 AM PST by
NRA1995
(I'd rather be a living "gun culture" member than a dead anti-gun candy-ass.)
To: neverdem; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; alrea; ...
To: neverdem
The analysis underscores the extent to which activists have trumped up a relatively mundane infrastructure issue into the premier environmental fight of this decade, leading to big marches and acts of civil disobedience to advance a cause that is worthy of neither. But, but, but liberal elites feel soooooooo alive when they're giving the finger to the middle class. They love to prance around jeering at police officers - letting the world know they don't need to have jobs... That's what they live for... their antics almost NEVER have anything to do with the environment.
15 posted on
03/08/2013 1:46:15 PM PST by
GOPJ
(DHS HAS secured: 1.6 BILLION bullets - 2.700 tanks and 35,000 drones ...to use on American soil...)
To: neverdem
WaPo is running interference for the Obama Administration again.
Obama has decided he’s going to let the project go through. So he makes sure the report says the pipeline won’t hurt the environment. And then his buddies at the WaPo write an editorial saying, “Let’s build it!”
I have only one question: What are the “reasonable measures to combat global warming” mentioned in the first paragraph?
17 posted on
03/09/2013 1:59:31 AM PST by
Rocky
(Obama is pure evil.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
