Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mgist

“We are talking about an entire years’ worth of GDP, the entire production of the entire American economy wiped out because of this financial crisis.”

I’m assuming he’s talking about the output gap between GDP pre-crisis and that trend and the current GDP now. What he ignores is that letting all the banks go with no inervention would likely have cost a multiple of this number.

Another thing he ignores is that the original TARP bill was simply to provide a backstop for the banks. in order to calm the markets. That was bastardized into the monstrosity that was passed by Congress because Barney Frank and Nancy Pelosi loaded it up with pork.


9 posted on 03/07/2013 1:27:31 PM PST by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wyatt's Torch

I think your assumption is incorrect. Towards the end of the interview Mr. Barofsky said: The last crisis cost $13 trillion.
This number is close to the GDP of the U.S., so I think he literally meant the total annual economic output of the U.S. I’ve never seen a number that high as regards the losses associated with the crash, but I’m far from an expert on the subject.


14 posted on 03/08/2013 2:17:32 PM PST by pluvmantelo (Democrats-The party of moral hazard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson