Can’t remember the details but wasn’t there a judge whose response to dismissing a case against b0nehead say that he flies on AF1, lives in the white hut (oh, sorry...house) has secret service surrounding him, etc. so of course he’s POTUS? So don’t question ANYTHING about him. Got it? The *ostriches* around here are going to wake up much too late.
You refer to circuit court judge Carroll’s “Miracle on 34th Street” ruling in Voeltz v. Obama.
Need it be pointed out that holding office is not proof of citizenship? Must the circular “reasoning” be pointed out? The question is whether an individual is eligible for office, claiming that holding office is evidence of eligibility is ridiculous. Such a claim is a negation of reason and an abdication of the court’s responsibility.
I believe it has been appealed.
I don’t know if Carroll should be disbarred (at the least) or commended for shining a 10,000 megawatt warning beacon - “hey there’s a BIG BIG problem here”.